Hi, I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion thread:
> Hi Chris, > > I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) whose slogan writes: > >> A self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non-technical users to connect, analyze and explore IoT data streams. > > Basically, StreamPark is for technical users and it does not specifically focus on IoT scenarios. It's a streaming application development and management platform mainly supporting Flink & Spark streaming applications. > Do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? I think this topic was also answered in the discussion thread. Please read through it: https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 Best, tison. tksonjk tk <[email protected]> 于2022年8月24日周三 12:26写道： > -1, (non-binding) > > Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain in > detail, thanks. and if you work for > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > call > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > the > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > Incubator > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > [2] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > >
