+1 (binding) I verified:
+ Dist artifacts valid and downloadable. + 3 released tarball has correct sign and checksum. + Do not found binary files in the source release. + LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIM are present in each release. + JAR files contain DEPENDENCIES file to show dependencies' license information + Build from source by ./build.sh with detach mode + scala 2.12 + jdk 1.8, and later run pnpm install & build to build the front end. - I cannot build the library with mixed mode due to multiple network issues. But this seems not be a blocker. nit: The release validation process has some typos and indent issues. I made https://github.com/apache/incubator-streampark-website/commit/0b04e3a8bd34eebb9306fb2f1f7f0db4250559a2 to fix. Best, tison. Huajie Wang <benj...@gmail.com> 于2022年12月25日周日 08:01写道： > Hello Incubator Community: > > The Apache StreamPark community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release, Apache StreamPark version 2.0.0-RC1, We now kindly request the > Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. > > Apache StreamPark, Make stream processing easier! easy-to-use streaming > application development framework and operation platform. > > > StreamPark community vote thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8683w7pwf24qg852px4ngwnorhqz27n1 > > Vote result thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/4qqw8vpw13ngtc4y2340o37crbf7oqjz > > The release candidate: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/streampark/2.0.0-RC1/ > > Git tag for the release: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-streampark/releases/tag/v2.0.0-rc1 > > Maven artifacts are available in a staging repository at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreampark-1004/ > > > The artifacts signed with PGP key [5AE01B8E], corresponding to [ > benj...@apache.org], that can be found in keys file: > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/streampark/KEYS > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of > votes are reached. > > Please vote accordingly: > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > Best, > Huajie Wang >
