I vote in [1] since it's how we practice for quite a while and it's a clear consensus by the vote.
All the repo of podlings have incubator- prefix, I don't see a motivation to change. In [2] it says: > make less work for Infra I wonder if INFRA complained for this process. And what is the associated JIRA ticket in INFRA to do the rename. I'd like to take INFRA's opinion into consideration. In my previous experience, keep the name "foo", let INFRA move the repo, rename it to "incubator-foo", and drop the prefix on graduation. In this way, the link "apache/foo" will always work with GH redirections. To John: > , it can be confusing that they do. What is the certain redirection causing your confusion? Best, tison. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/n18gkb23bp005gb176jnwo2nrxty3z84 [2] https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/2700 Sheng Wu <wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com>于2024年4月17日 周三12:09写道： > This is not to get the conclusion, and it is not clear, and many other > project repositories are with this prefix. > > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/transferring.html#first_steps_outside_the_incubator > (tison > found) > > Graduation doc is there indicating incaubtor- prefix is expected. This is > just a 10s operation on GitHub admin page, not a heavy work. Graduation is > not happening every day, even not every month. Developer don't have to > change remote git, as that redirect forward is supported too. > > More importantly, I don't agree this is clear without prefix. > > This us serious change, if you inist this is clear, start a vote. A lot of > ppl in this context don't agree too. > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Apache SkyWalking > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@gmail.com>于2024年4月17日 周三11:59写道： > > > Hi, > > > > Both of these projects are new and just getting set up. I'd give them a > > little time to do that. Infra in recent years have asked to minimise work > > for them on graduation. We recently dropped the requirement for having > > incubating in podling domain names so I don't see it's needed in repo > names > > as long as it clear the project is an incubating project. > > Kind Regards, > > Justin > > > > > > On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, 1:47 pm Willem Jiang, <willem.ji...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > With the "incubator" profix, it's easy for us to tell if the project > > > belongs to the incubator and it is still in the incubating process. > > > Currently I cannot find any disclaimer document[1] in the repo root > > > directory from [2][3] to tell if they are still in the incubator or > > > not. > > > > > > [1]https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaimers > > > [2]https://github.com/apache/amoro > > > [3]https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:06 AM Calvin Kirs <k...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Podlings are not yet fully accepted as part of the Apache Software > > > > Foundation. > > > > > > > > I haven't specifically witnessed any formal decision or process for > > > > removing the "incubator" prefix from repository names. > > > > > > > > Unless there are compelling reasons to remove the "incubator" > prefix, I > > > > believe it's important to maintain a clear distinction between > Podlings > > > and > > > > TLPs, especially in situations where confusion is likely to arise. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:32 AM Sheng Wu <wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Same mistake for Armoro as Hertzbeat team was misguided from > > > > > https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/2700 > > > > > > > > > > This is not discussed AFAIK, and the description is not correct. > > > > > GitHub supported renaming and repository path forward automatically > > > > > years ago. apache/incubator-foo -> apache/foo is transparent and > both > > > > > addresses work. > > > > > > > > > > This should not be changed randomly considering many other projects > > > > > are using incubator- prefix. This renaming causes confusion. IPMC > are > > > > > making sure the website has `incubating` and disclaimer as always, > > > > > suddenly some projects even could use repository names without > > > > > prefixes. This is wrong. > > > > > > > > > > Mentors of Armoro and Hertzbeat should follow the existing > > > > > requirements, and PPMC members of these two projects should ask > INFRA > > > > > to rename, adding the incubator- prefix back. > > > > > > > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > > > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > > > > > > Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org> 于2024年4月17日周三 10:19写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the > > > project > > > > > > > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the discussions in this mailing list, the only change > made > > > is > > > > > the removal of `incubator` from the domain. Now, users access ` > > > > > polding.apache.org` instead of `polding.incubator.apache.org` by > > > default. > > > > > > > > > > > > The project and releases are still required to include > "incubator", > > > and > > > > > it's important for the PPMC to clearly communicate that this > project > > > > > remains under incubation. > > > > > > > > > > > > In this case, I believe Hertzbeat PPMC made a mistake. I will > > suggest > > > > > they rename it to incubator-hertzbeat. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024, at 14:23, rat O wrote: > > > > > > > First of all, congratulations to HertzBeat for successfully > > > entering > > > > > > > the Apache Incubator. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I noticed that the project has created an issue for an unknown > > > license > > > > > > > and is ready to address it. I'm sure the project will also > > address > > > > > > > other unknown licenses, if they exist. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wonder if the situation of having a significant amount of > > > non-English > > > > > > > languages in the codes, like these > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/warehouse/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/warehouse/config/WarehouseProperties.java > > > > > , > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/entity/manager/NoticeRule.java > > > > > , > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/config/AviatorConfiguration.java > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > , will all of them also be addressed in the future? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the > > > project > > > > > > > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Xuanwo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best wishes！ > > > > CalvinKirs > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
