Hi Jean, Thank you so much for the feedback!
Let me clarify. The following sentence in LICENSE is just an intro for the list after it. Assuming this is not a blocking issue, I will update the sentence in next release for better clarity. “This product bundles various third-party components also under the Apache Software License 2.0.” Regards, Feilong He On 2025/10/23 04:45:33 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > My question is not on bundle term, it’s more this sentence sounds that > other code than the ones listed in the license is bundled. If not, it means > that this sentence is just an intro for the list after (which I guess) but > it’s confusing to me. > > As said, the license is correct here, but it’s just to clarify with the > podling. > > Regards > JB > > Le mer. 22 oct. 2025 à 23:52, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > > HI, > > > > > -- LICENSE is correct but "This product bundles various third-party > > > components" looks weird to me (as it's source, nothing is bundled) > > > > Bundled is teh correct term; it just means included, and third-party code > > is included in the source release. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Justin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
