Ted Husted wrote:
> On 2/10/2001 at 12:40 AM Conor MacNeill wrote:
>
> >Also, in the paragraph below, does "more +1 votes than -1 votes" imply
> only
> >binding +1/-1 votes. For example say there is a vote and 3 committers
> vote
> >+1 and four non-committers vote -1, what would happen?
>
> That's why I want to remove the word binding. Right now, it does sound
> like anyone's -1's might count ;-).
>
> In context, the prior statement "All Developers are encouraged to
> participate in decisions, but the decision itself is made by those that
> have Committer status in the Project" falls through and removes the
> ambiguity. Only the votes of Committers are actually tallied.
>
> Alternatively, I would suggest that we include the binding modifier
> wherever it would apply, making the language
>
> >"An action item requiring majority approval must receive at
> >least 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than
> >binding -1 votes (i.e., a majority with a minimum quorum
> >of three positive votes)."
>
I like that one better, even though "inherited meaning" would be more o-o
oriented :-).
> -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
> -- Custom Software ~ Technical Services.
> -- Tel 716 425-0252; Fax 716 223-2506.
> -- http://www.husted.com/about/struts/
>
Craig
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
