> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > IMHO, the best election process would be to let the committers
> > submit a ballot containing the list of committers they want to
> > have in the PMC. Then, just choose the 10 - 15 committers who
> > got the most votes.
>
> That suggestion has some merit.  However, I am concerned that the
resulting
> list would end up with a number of people interested in some of the larger
> subprojects and not many people interested in some of the smaller ones.
>
> Getting coverage over the entire code base was the primary motivation for
> this round of elections.  I realize that some view the 3.3 release of
> Tomcat as a separate project, but in fact it is a release of a subproject.
> There are quite a few PMC members with commit access to that code base and
> who follow tomcat-dev closely.  And have helped both publically and
"behind
> the scenes" getting Tomcat 3.3 approved.


Here's the text of an email I sent privately to Pier by accident :

I think my original email was a bit rude, so please allow me to apologize
for
it; I just didn't know how to express myself properly and <insert here lame
excuse about English not being my primary langugage>).

I thought that if you want to promote openess by having this election, you
should as well allow us to just vote for any committer. People are not aware
of the fact that Costin may or may not be interested.

Note that you also must be willing to do some project management work (which
can
be time consuming) if you're elected and accept the nomination (which isn't
something I'd be willing to do personally).

> > To voice my disapproval with the current process, I won't participate
> > in the current ballot.
>
> That is certainly your right.  A d@mn shame IMHO, but nevertheless your
> right.  I hope you reconsider.

Ok, here's my vote :
[+1] Ceki Gülcü
[+1] Costin Manolache (even if I disagree with him half the time)

Remy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to