Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
> Sam, stop being a pain in the ass for everything that anyone does
> in not perfect accordance with your "ideas" (I'm kinda getting
> bored of this attitude of pointing out any single stupid detail).
Pier - I beg to differ. In this case, I am not an ass, I am an idiot, as
the e-mail below will amply prove.
What seems to be an obvious detail to you is one that is clearly beyond my
limited comprehension.
- Sam Ruby
---------------------- Forwarded by Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM on 03/02/2001
07:51 PM ---------------------------
Sam Ruby
02/24/2001 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
From: Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Subject: Re: Library project reset (Document link: Sam Ruby)
Ted Husted wrote:
> Sam -- how do the PMC votes on new subprojects work? Would we vote
> +0 to approve only and +1 to approve and commit? Or is it just
> thumbs-up thumbs-down.
Traditionally, the PMC has voted +1 to approve, without any indication that
the individual would participate. One of possible implications of that has
been a lack of involvement of the PMC members in various subprojects...
Take a moment to reflect on the bootstrap this potential subproject is
agonizing over.
Currently there are zero committers. There seems to be an implicit
assumption that if three or more people agree to work on something (each of
you happen to be committers to some Jakarta project - you can decide
whether or not that is relevant) then the code base and the contributors
will be added. No consultation with the previous committers (as there
aren't any at this point) is required.
> Which begs another question in the Apache HTTPD and Jakarta
> guidelines -- is +0 a "positive" vote?
No.
- Sam Ruby
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
