In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Sean Legassick wrote:
>>
>>Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>> The other being a potential
>>>regression in reflection/security found in Scarab. I say potential
>>>regression as I don't know yet if it is a security hole that has been
>>>closed, a tightening up of checks that prior JDKs were lax on, or a bug.
>>>In any case, the project is not an Apache one and the owners do not seem
>>>predisposed to pursue it...
>>
>>The problem, however, is with use of the Texen tool which is a part of
>>Velocity, and the problem would occur with any use of that tool...
>
>So we now have a volunteer? ;-) Cool!
Yeah I don't mind looking over it when I get a chance... I'm quite good
on reflection stuff...
> The first is the interface changes to java.sql. While these apparently
> were approved internally, I don't think anybody fully realized the scope
> of the impact of these changes. I still think new interfaces should be
> defined, probably extending the original ones, and both sets supported.
+1 on pushing for that.
Sean
--
Sean Legassick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeg er mann: Ingenting menneskelig er fremmed for meg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
