Well Ted..... the jokes on you...
Have a look at ActionServlet versus this coding standard. :))
(no offense to anyone, this is in jest)
Erik
p.s. I've given CheckStyle a try... its a tough one to live with as its
stringent, but perhaps this could be used during builds to spit out code
standard non-compliance warnings: http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-alexandria/proposal/gump/site/xdocsant.xml
> Atta boy, Jon!
>
> (This may be your politest, most professional message yet ;-)
>
>
> Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
> >
> > on 1/2/02 6:34 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > + if (runtime != null)
> > > + depend.setAttribute("runtime", runtime.getValue());
> >
> > "All Java Language source code in the repository must be written in
> > conformance to the "Code Conventions for the Java Programming Language
as
> > published by Sun."
> >
> > <http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConventions.doc6.html#449>
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > -jon
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
