Ted Husted wrote: > > As it stands, both are simply subprojects, and so a Commons committer is > a Commons committer. Ditto for Taglibs.
It is also fair to point out that an Avalon committer is a committer to the framework itself as well as to testlet, logkit, phoenix, cornerstone, excalibur, and site. So, one could draw a conclusion that anybody who choses not to participate in Commons due to this structure would also chose to withdraw from Avalon until this is corrected. > In a way, the Commons and Taglibs subproject represent the other > approach to Jakarta that people sometimes advocate, but so far a strong > leader has not stepped up to fulfill the other half of that model. I have quietly stated several times that I would prefer that a Jakarta committer is a Jakarta committer. Gaging by the response I got each time, I figured that then was not the time to push the issue. - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
