ARE two +1 votes necessary?  That was not mentioned in the original email
"Announcement: JakartaPMC elections for 2002".  (Just to stave off any
potential debate here, the ASF-appointed administrator gets to decide how
elections are run.  It's not our call.)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:52 PM
Subject: RE: To jvote or not to jvote


> Thanks Dirk.
>
>
> But then, from what I can see in the "general" list, only
> Geir has both the nomination and the 2 necessary additional
> +1s all sent to "jvote".
>
> How should this be fixed?
>
>
> This is what I see in "general":
> (I am skipping those that refused the nomination.)
>
>  - Ted Husted
>      The 3rd +1 did not get to "jvote".
>
>  - Stefan Bodewig
>  - Conor MacNeill
>      Nothing went to "jvote".
>      (I think that both are still missing votes.)
>
>  - Scott Sanders
>      Only the nomination went to "jvote".
>
>  - Sam Ruby
>      Nothing went to "jvote".
>
>  - Peter Donald
>      Nothing went to "jvote".
>
>  - Paulo Gaspar
>      Nothing went to "jvote".
>
>  - Morgan Delagranje
>      Only his acceptance went to "jvote".
>
>  - Geir Magnusson
>      Enough votes went to "jvote".
>
>  - Diane Holt
>      Only the nomination went to "jvote".
>
>  - Craig McClanahan
>      Only the nomination and one vote went to "jvote".
>
>  - Costin Manolache
>      Only the nomination and one vote went to "jvote".
>
> Have fun,
> Paulo Gaspar
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:36 PM
> > To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: To jvote or not to jvote
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
> >
> > > >From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not.
> >
> > > Why? What are the rules?
> >
> > See below. We'll debug the message for the next election to make sure it
> > is clearer.
> >
> > What we will be checking on the 7th is what we have received on the
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -> and in particular those messages
> > from the nominee himself or herself that he or she is willing to
> > be run in the election.
> >
> > Dw.
> >
> >
> > T+7     Nominations for PMC needs to be in by 0:00 GMT 7th of
> >         February 2001. You can either nominate yourself - or
> >         nominate someone else. What counts is the confirmation
> >         from the nominee being received.
> >
> >         ->      Posting a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> >                 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your candidature, a short
> >                 description about who you are, what you want to
> >                 accomplish.
> >
> >         ->      Or if you are volunteered by someone else - a similar
> >                 message confirming that you are accepting the
> >                 nomination - with again - some details about yourself.
> >
> >         ->      PMC seats are open to anyone. Regardless as to
> >                 wether you are a committer, lurker or coder. And
> >                 you can even nominate a complete outsider (assuming
> >                 he or she would consent of course.)
> >
> >         ->      The board volunteers handling the vote cannot
> >                 be nominated.
> >
> >         ->      The nomination must include the email address of
> >                 the nominee. And it really should be a valid one :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to