Sorry to all if my tone seemed harsh. This is just the 3rd thread I've seen 
in the 2 weeks or so since I've joined this email list bashing the very 
technologies we use in jakarta. I saw one saying Java sucks, another saying 
Java is dying because Sun won't release it open source(or something of that 
nature) and now this anti-J2EE/EJB-your a moron if you use it-thread. It 
seems to me that if I joined a list that pertains to jakarta java, J2EE type 
technologies then I wouldn't post messages bashing the very technologies the 
group exists to support. For example, I wouldn't join a Microsoft ASP 
technical forum to bash Microsoft or ASP.

This is just why I would like to see the discussions center around 
supporting jakarta projects and not on the merits of them or their 
underlying technologies.

I apoligize to Aaron for jumping the gun as to his character and using 
inappropriate language in this forum. I use it a lot outside of here though. 
And I enjoy it.

I have a lot of problems with Java/J2EE/EJB/etc.also. I just don't think 
this is an appropriate forum.
thanks,
Mike

PS: I got some good responses pertaining to jakarta projects. Thanks to all. 
I've written a ton of code, in addition to the persistence layer, that I 
plan to put on source forge.


>From: "Aaron Smuts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Michael Lee'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net
>Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:37:38 -0500
>
>
>Hi:
>
>I wasn't trying to be political at all.  I've just been frustrated by my
>experiences with Weblogic, but I still use it:  I generally off load
>image type conversion and PDF generation to the appserver.
>
>Please don't take the argument so personally.
>
>I'm not an egomaniac and I wasn't trying to insult you personally in any
>way.
>
>So, I'm driven to a bit of exaggeration and overstatement at times
>especially when criticizing over-hyped technology like EJB.  I've got
>lots of problems with XML and JSP too, if anyone else wants to fight :)
>
>Cheers,
>
>Aaron
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 1:07 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net
> >
> >
> > So by your response I take it you don't know how I can submit a
>project to
> > jakarta?
> >
> > Did you even read the whole post? Keep the politics off the discussion
> > boards. Especially comments as such;
> >
> > "Not arguing with you here.  (These discussion just provoke stupid
> > comments like that.)". I guess good grammar is not indicative of
> > intelligence. Besides, I was using sarcasm to make the point to help
> > deflate
> > your oversided ego.
> >
> > Your smarter than all the developers on every App server and my
>comment is
> > stupid. Everyone that uses any J2EE technologies is a moron and your
>the
> > smartest person ever to exist. Ok, fine. Whatever you want. Your a
>winner.
> > Just keep the politics off the discussion thread.
> >
> > I've never contributed to jakarta or any open source forum but thought
>I
> > would check it out and see what it's all about. With attitudes like
>this
> > I'm
> > beginning to think this might be a mistake. I run into enough
>egomaniacs
> > in
> > my job without dealing with these assholes when I'm just trying to
>help
> > out
> > the community for free. Why should I take shit when I'm not getting
>paid?
> > This is exactly why politics should be off the forum. It's
>discouraging
> > for
> > people that want to get involved.
> >
> >
> > >From: "Aaron Smuts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: "'Jakarta General List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net
> > >Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 18:26:37 -0500
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Knowing my qualifications here is my response to Aaron's post whom
>I
> > >have
> > > > summarized with this one line from him;
> > > > "No matter what you try to do with EJB, I can provide a simpler,
> > >faster,
> > > > more scalable, and cheaper solution."
> > > >
> > >
> > >I was obviously overstating the matter.  I guess I had too much wine.
> > >Ok. Let's be fair, 98% of what most people need from an appserver can
>be
> > >done in other ways.
> > >
> > >I think that comment was actually in reference to the specific
>features
> > >listed as beneficial about EJB. ?
> > >
> > > > Wow, you should start your own company. Your obviously much
>smarter
> > >than
> > > > the
> > > > 100 or so developers that make Weblogic or the 50 or so that make
> > >JBoss,
> > > > or
> > > > the ? 100 ? or so that make Websphere, etc.
> > >
> > >Not arguing with you here.  (These discussion just provoke stupid
> > >comments like that.)
> > >
> > >You can make a Java Bean
> > > > container that can handle
> > >
> > > >clustering,
> > >
> > >Oh ya, weblogic clustering is so nice.  You have to practically take
> > >down the entire cluster in 6.0 to update.
> > >
> > > >fail over,
> > >
> > >Got what I need in a load balancer and in JCS.  There are some
> > >transactional failover features in appservers that are nice though.
> > >
> > > > caching,
> > >
> > >Got it: JCS
> > >
> > > > persistence,
> > >
> > >Got it: JDBC
> > >
> > > > transactional services,
> > >
> > >Got what I need in the JDBC.
> > >
> > > > security, etc.
> > >
> > >Got it:  RBAC
> > >
> > > >better than all those people?
> > >
> > >Most of this can be done fairly simply and most people just don't
>need
> > >what the appserver vendors are selling.
> > >
> > >If you had said 2 phase commit, then I'd make concessions.
> > >
> > > >Wow,
> > > > your the man.
> > >
> > >Thanks.
> > >
> > > >If I could create a product by myself better than all those
> > > > people and create a billion dollar company I would. Seems stupid
>not
> > >to?
> > > > Kind of strange you call 'people' stupid
> > >
> > >Just to be clear.  I never called anyone stupid.  I never used the
>word.
> > >That was in the subject line that I replied to.  I didn't notice it
>till
> > >someone else replied.  I would have taken it out. (as I just did.)
> > >
> > >and claim you can do better than
> > > > these teams at creating this monumental amount of complex code
> > >
> > >No.  I use a good amount of clear code.
> > >
> > >  yet you
> > > > don't
> > > > do it, even though it could bring you great wealth? Ok then, how
>about
> > > > open
> > > > source?
> > >
> > >Oh, I am a contributor to a couple of Jakarta projects but have no
> > >intension of building an appserver.
> > >
> > >Cheers,
> > >
> > >Aaron
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
>




_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to