All the time.... *grumble grumble - darn Microsoft Word image placement
headaches*..... :)



----- Original Message -----
From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:47 PM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Switching development to C#


> Erik,
>
> Are you talking to your office documents again? :-)
>
> Conor
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 2 April 2002 1:43 PM
> > To: Jakarta General List
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Switching development to C#
> >
> >
> > Ummm, if you're using .NET wouldn't you be able to natively talk (COM,
> > perhaps) to Office documents, thereby obliviating the need for POI
> > altogether?!   :)  (this is said jokingly, but if I'm off base then feel
> > free to enlighten me).
> >
> >     Erik
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:25 PM
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Switching development to C#
> >
> >
> > > I've been thinking about it...Perhaps we shouldn't port POI over to
C#,
> > > perhaps we should utilize the full power of .NET and port it to all
7-13
> > > languages it supports currently!  Meaning
> > >
> > > POIFS = VB.NET
> > > HSSF = C#
> > > HPSF = PERL.NET
> > > HDF = J#
> > >
> > > I mean, thats one degree of separation!  Think of all the advantages
> > > learning all of these different languages (sadly I know them all
except
> > > for C#/J# which you could argue I know via knowing Java).
> > >
> > > Gosh!  That should help POI out tremendously.
> > >
> > > -Andy
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 20:15, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
> > > > Do you have anything against Fortran or Cobol?
> > > >
> > > > There will be .Net implementations for those, you know? And we could
> > > > leverage the power of all those "legacy" academic and enterprise
> > > > programmers.
> > > >
> > > > (I bet there are a lot of Cobol guys getting a lot of free time on
> > > > their hands after the Y2K mess.)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Paulo
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:10 PM
> > > > > To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Switching development to C#
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Marc wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Having become convinced by Andy that C# and .NET are the
> > wave of the
> > > > > > future, I'm proposing that we switch poi development to C#.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To the Jakarta community at large: will this affect our
> > status as a
> > > > > > Jakarta project? I mean, I can see where a lot of projects are
> > > > > > eventually going to follow this same path ...
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm ok with using .NET, but I think you should use BASIC as
> > language,
> > > > > not C#. .NET is language independent, and other jakarta projects
> > > > > already switched to BASIC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Costin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.superlinksoftware.com
> > > http://jakarta.apache.org/poi - port of Excel/Word/OLE 2 Compound
> > > Document
> > >                             format to java
> > > http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html
> > > - fix java generics!
> > > The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
> > > vote.
> > > -Ambassador Kosh
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to