At 9:30 AM -0600 4/24/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Now I wonder if using crossdb for Torque would be a good idea.
>Reason being is that you wouldn't have to rebuild all your classes
>and scripts like you would using Torque now if you wanted to use a
>different database. Or even modifying the database, you wouldn't
>have to rebuild everything, just change it in one spot and run it.
>And when distributing it, the end user wouldn't need to run the
>builds again either, they could just package it in a war file or
>something, get the right crossdb implementation and run it.
is it time to move this discussion to the Torque developer list,
then? (Presumably "turbine-dev").
Just a thought...
Joe
(BTW, I had figured out that Torque is decoupled from Turbine, but
what would be the harm in promoting it to a top level project?)
--
--
* Joe Germuska { [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
"It's pitiful, sometimes, if they've got it bad. Their eyes get
glazed, they go white, their hands tremble.... As I watch them I
often feel that a dope peddler is a gentleman compared with the man
who sells records."
--Sam Goody, 1956
tune in posse radio: <http://www.live365.com/stations/289268>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
