I'm a non-binding +1 on moving OJB to Jakarta BTW. More below... From: "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on 4/30/02 11:11 AM, "Gerhard Froehlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > PS: hmm curious if takes the "jon hurdle" ;-). > > +1. > > The proposal and project clearly meet ALL of the requirements set out on the > newproject page. > > I would really like to see some sort of commitment to torque->obj > integration/use/conversion/whatever though.
Agreed. I'd like to see how the Torque XML database schema document could be used to generate the SQL, documentation and OJB compliant model too. Then we'd have the best of both worlds. I noticed Torque already has a 'project-ojb-model' which kinda works (and looks much cleaner generated code than the Torque equivalent) but doesn't quite work yet. It certainly looks like a promising area of development. James _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
