Berin Loritsch wrote: > > There have been alot of talk back and forth about Maven, Krysalis > Centipede, GUMP, ANT, etc., and we are all missing some basic > points. > > 1) GUMP is a continuous integration tool. It is not meant to be > more than that. I find it an invaluable tool, and the information > it gives me is necessary.
Excellent post. The issue I have is that it is not giving that information for projects which have chosen to adopt Maven. This issue is addressible. I'll even go further than that. Ultimately I see it likely that something in either the Ant or Maven/Centipede space will likely subsume the function that Gump currently provides. That would be great. Meanwhile, if a working Gump project descriptor - as generated by Maven - for projects which convert to Maven could be considered as a part of the virtual "checklist" for projects considering converting to Maven, then I would be happy. - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
