On Mon, 13 May 2002 20:17, Danny Angus wrote: > Sometimes lists are where the activity is, commits alone don't credit the > essential design and planning effort put in by users commiters and > non-commiters that shapes the product and maps its progress.
Agreed - even worse. Sometimes after these activity meters turn up you get committers breaking up one commit into many commits, presumably to push their activity level up. You also get the many typographic changes for much the same reason. I have found that higher healthy activity is actually indicated by small localized changes. This is not going to be captured in a simple count the commits and note the committer style approach. -- Cheers, Peter Donald -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
