Oh, ok.
I thought that trying the A record was a last-ditch attempt once every means
of getting an MX record had failed.
d.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 14 May 2002 13:55
> To: Jakarta General List
> Subject: Re: is DNS ok?
>
>
> "Danny Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 11:01:34   Request from 192.168.0.3 for MX-record for
> jakarta.apache.org.
> > 11:01:34   Sending request to ns.hyperreal.org. (209.133.83.22) for
> > MX-record for jakarta.apache.org.
> > 11:01:34   Reply from 209.133.83.22 about MX-record for
> jakarta.apache.org.:
> > 11:01:34   -> Answer: No Matching Records available.
> > 11:01:34   -> Authority: SOA-record for apache.org. = ns.hyperreal.org.
> > [2002041601]
> > 11:01:34   Sending reply to 192.168.0.3 about MX-record for
> > jakarta.apache.org.:
> > 11:01:34   -> Answer: No MX-Records available for jakarta.apache.org.
> > 11:01:34   -> Authority: SOA-record for apache.org. = ns.hyperreal.org.
> > [2002041601]
>
> Yes, it is... MX is used to override an A record, for example
> since we have
> no A record for Apache.ORG, we have a MX record, but
> jakarta.apache.org has
> an A record (63.251.56.142), therefore, no problems with that...
>
>     Pier
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to