Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> 
>> * Perhaps a more fruitful topic for us to explore is when to retire
>> committer status due to inactivity.  Pier is one of the few to do this
>> explicitly.  I have done it a bit more implicitly - including submitting
>> patches to projects that I am officially a committer to.
>> 
> 
> yes.  I recommend whatever the general guideline be that it recognize
> historic contributions.  Something like "Honored fellow" so that the
> person is still on the "contributers" page but listed as inactive
> without any insulting connotation.

Members have the concept of being "emeritus" (emeriti, my Latin's getting so
bad). The idea that any emeritus could get back to full status whenever he
wants. The only thing is how we want to decide when someone becomes an
"emeritus"...

    Pier


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to