On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 15:50, Paulo Gaspar wrote: > Despite all the arguments I still can NOT see why it should be > more complicated than this (Sam + Jon definitions).
there's been numerous examples mentioned in this thread. Also, the system already _is_ more complicated than the definitions below. A committer can also vote for the PMC. Someone who wants to do administration/documentation but should not be trusted with CVS should not be made a committer, etc etc etc. > Probably the system is already as good as it can get. I think the underlying thoughts and the spirit of the system (like what's written below, the concepts of meritocracy, do-ocracy, trust, etc) are about as good as it gets. Implementation can always use some work ;) - Leo > > "Anyone" can suggest a change. > > > > A "developer" can submit a patch. > > > > A "committer" can make it happen. > > > > ;-) > > > > -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
