I think there was a big discussion on tomcat-dev about this a year ago. Someone suggested to remove the source, since it took extra download time and wasn't used anyway. The thread was pretty big as far as I remember.. I guess if the source is still distributes with the binary, it was -1 on that one ;)
Mvgr, Martin On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 22:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I noticed some projects distribute separate 'dist' and 'source' packages, > and some include the source in the dist package as well. > > In some cases the 'source' included with the dist doesn't include > build.xml and the auxiliary files. > > I remember many discussions on 'guideliness' for jakarta distributions, > was this discussed and is there any good document on how a distribution > should look like ? > > Also, I remember discussions on a centralised cvs repository with all the > binary jars that are redistributable. Did it get -1 or what is needed > to get such a thing ? > > > Costin > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
