+1. Gump should be community property. Scott
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [discussion] jakarta-gump as community property > > > Gump is now two years old. It has had contributions from > over a dozen > people, about a half-dozen this month alone. There seems to be a > renewed interest in gump (some in response to a little > nudging <grin>). > > Considering all of this, what I would like to propose is that the > contents of jakarta-alexandria/proposal/gump get moved to > jakarta-gump, > all committers to any jakarta code base be given karma and > voting rights > on the full contents (descriptors, code, and stylesheets > alike) and that > a single [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing be created (we are all devs > here, right?) > > Thoughts? > > - Sam Ruby > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:general-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
