Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Damn. I thought you did understand me Ken -- guess not. I've written 10x as manyJames Mitchell wrote:No JSP does indeed suck. It just sucks less with Struts. LOL......ok, we'll leave it at that.
You gotta understand Andy, he's got his own language:
- it sucks == I don't get it
JSP pages as most of the JSP-lovers. My first JSP page was in version 0.8 (or so)
with Netscape Application Server. It used to corrupt the pages at random and require
you to go touch the files (funnnnnn!)...
Before that I was writing ASP pages. JSP sucks slightly less than ASP. But I prefer to
call JSP: InvertedServlets.
Just because I understand it, doesn't mean it doesn't suck.
My ass. This means that conceptually I like it, but that either its crappy code with 900 levels- the idea is good but implementation sucks == I'm not able to use it
of inheritence tree to sort though. It throws random exceptions.
- it sucks but with this and that it sucks less == I'm able to use it
No. It means the suckiness is mitigated.
No. I'm the author of something called SuckyViewer... I don't think thats justified. If I write something
- it's very good == I wrote it
that sucks I incorporate the suck into its name. Therefore its clearly labeled (which makes it suck less I suppose).
I renamed it sheet viewer after someone refactored it not to suck anymore.
No.. I typically know why.
- you should use it == it simply works, dunno why but I like it
Ummm name something I've noted Rocks that I haven't used?- it rocks == I've never used it but it makes me salivate
;-P
<glare> -Andy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
