On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 03:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:


On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 03:01 PM, Nick Chalko wrote:

*nod*. +1 on using what Maven currently has, merged with anything Ruper
has learnt about being outside of Maven and tested by both the Maven
and
Centipede communities. -1 to JJAR as it's just never made it into
reality.
Why use a dead-component, or aspects of it, when there are two
versions of
a live component in place.


<sigh> Read what I said...
Sorry. I replied to the reply to the reply and not your initial bit
*whistle hopefully*
:)

This is getting silly.

All I was saying was that my note about JJAR should not be interpreted as a push to get it going. If I thought that, I'd rekindle it...

Geir said:

JJAR in commons sandbox had some of these ideas in there...  But can
you build this into maven rather than in parallel?
Apologies,

Hen


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
Geir Magnusson Jr                                   203-956-2604(w)
Adeptra, Inc.                                       203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to