Peter Donald wrote: > > The decision not to use LGPL in Apache code is not due to license violations > but a policy based decision handed down from the board as they dont feel it > furthers Apaches aims.
incorrect. or at best incomplete and misleading. http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=641442 http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=640360 perhaps you're referring to: http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=641503 in which roy mentions it as a policy rather than a legal concern. he is speaking to a specific question. i suppose failing to protect our users from inheriting onerous licence restrictions could be interpreted as not 'furthering apache's aims,' but, as i said, i consider that more than a little misleading. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
