I'd hope the ASF would vote against it in the final vote if it doesn't
support open implementations with reasonable licenses.

On 6/25/03 9:11 AM, "Vic Cekvenich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> http://www.theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=20005
> 
> http://www.theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=19942
> 
> As per above I Quote:
> "though IBM and Motorola still voted no. There also appear to be some
> disagreements within the JCP board about the licensing of these specs.
> Sun apparently plans to charge a "Per unit royalty fee which will be
> dependent on volume."
> 
> Doug Lea voted with comment.
> 
> Apache vote with Sun with YES, without comment this says.
> 
> I am wondering why? Other voted YES with comment.
> 
> I personally wish they voted NO as they did in past on similar topic. I
> mean look at the implications, such as JBOSS is not J2EE (no big fan of
> EJB here),  this makes it harder to have a Jakarta project that is JCP.
> 
> Is anyone privy to ASF feeling on this topic related to open source in
> general and Java? I know there was some agreement btwn Sun and ASF.
> JCP *is* Sun domintated, but not ASF, AFAIK
> IBM seems more friendly to O.S, they said OK, but had a comment.
> 
> 
> .V
> 
> 
> ps: This is a possibility as well down the road:
> http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20030213.html
> 
> That is why my clients don't use Sun VM in favor of BEA J:Rockit, and
> IBM VM. Java would live past Sun, should the worst happen.
> http://www.penguincomputing.com/graphics/desktops/eclipse1280x1024.jpg
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
Andrew C. Oliver
http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp
Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI

http://jakarta.apache.org/poi
For Java and Excel, Got POI?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to