[I like "Turbineers". :-) ]
I am one of them, and I did some discussion about JCS @ ApacheCon with
Martin Poeschl (who seems to do the odd fix to JCS because he uses it in
Torque), another Turbineer. We basically were came to the same
conclusion as robert:
- JCS is cute and should have a larger exposure
- JCS isn't related at all to Turbine. At most it is related to Torque
- JCS could be moved to db.apache.org but it is not really database
specific
- There is (almost) no resistance to move this project out of Turbine.
So my vote is
> ------------------------------------------>8
>
> (comments here, please)
>
> ------------------------------------------>8
> [ ] leave it within turbine
> [ ] move it to apache commons
> [X] move it to jakarta commons
> [ ] move it to incubator
> [ ] something else (please specify)...
> --------------------------------------------
If JCS really catches on, we can still move it back to Jakarta as
"Jakarta JCS".
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services
freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
"Au�erdem k�nnen in Deutschland alle Englisch. [...] so entf�llt die
Notwendigkeit [...] Deutsch zu lernen."
-- Johan Micoud auf die Frage warum er kein Deutsch spricht.
(http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/0,1518,273205,00.html)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
