The list of TLP sugestions outlined below is a good starting point. I'll
suggest some applicability:

The question is whether some projects are willing to make the step to TLP.
These seem like possible candidates:
Tomcat, Lucene, Struts, Velocity

Some others don't strike me as moving out:
BCEL, BSF, ECS, ORO, Regexp, Taglibs

In fact, IMHO what is left in Jakarta is Jakarta-Commons plus other
utility-like projects that might on a different day have been created in
commons.

(I still think there are some tricky cases - POI, Log4J, Tapestry.... )

I am hoping that developers in some of the larger jakarta products push for
promotion sooner rather than later.

Stephen

----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In the light of a request to the PMC by a Jakarta sub-project to have its
> own "top-level" wiki I thought of this...
>
> Jakarta is attempting to put our house in order wrt oversight, this is
> manifesting itself as incresed centralisation of oversight, and reduced
> autonomy for sub-projects.
>
> An issue we've discussed before is promotion to TLP of existing mature
> sub-projects. This started off with an assertion that no-one from Ant
would
> be in favour, and ended up with Ant, Avalon, James and Maven all taking
the
> plunge.
>
> One of the most obvious benefits of TLP to promoted sub-projects is their
> own top-level infrastructure. Providing access to this from within Jakarta
> seems wrong, it breaks the seperation of concerns, would provide
ammunition
> to the argument that this PMC doesn't have full oversight and blurs the
> line between project and sub-project. If a project wants this it should
> consider promotion as the route to achieve it.
>
> I would like to propose (but this is not a proposal, just provoking
> discussion) that we draw up some benchmarks for promotion, which could
give
> some indication that a sub-project is ready to *consider* promotion, and
> probably should do so seriously.
>
> These could be similar to the guidelines for adoption as a sub-project
> (http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html).
> some ideas are noted below (a little tongue-in-cheek in the style of a
> lifestyle magazine).
>
> Such checks need not compel a sub-project to apply for promotion, but I
> would certainly like sub-projects to consider it as they grow in size,
> maturity or scope, and perhaps an official checklist will remind people
and
> give them the confidence to raise the subject, and perhaps a target to aim
> for.
>
> 1/ Community dynamic,
> a) Is your community self sustaining and largely independant of other
parts
> of Jakarta?
> Not the individuals, the community. Is it, for instance, so heavily
> influenced by the direction of some other sub-project that membership of
> both is virtually a pre-requisite for understanding.
> b) Are many of your commiters also commiters of some other sub-project for
> this, or similar, reasons?
>
> 2/ Project Management,
> a) Does your sub-project need or get much direction from the Jakarta PMC
> (or is it mostly handled by the comitters with lip service paid to the
> PMC)?
>
> 3/ Community health,
> a) Is your community highly dependant on one or two key people, or is
> there a real mix of talent working as a team?
> b) Is there generally an amicable, if hotly debated, concensus?
>
> 4/ Infrastructure resources,
> a) Does your sub-project have aspirations to own its own top-level
> resources (cvs, mailing lists, wiki, web-site)?
>
> 5/ Product seperation,
> a) Is your product tightly bound to other Jakarta sub-projects (excluding
> commons) or does it only supply a need or consume deliverables in the
usual
> way?
> b) Does your sub-project contribute a lot of code to another, or receive a
> lot of contributions from another Jakarta sub-project?
>
> 6/ Scope,
> a) Has your sub-project outgrown it's original scope?
> b) Does your sub-project have a need or desire to maintain it's own
> sub-projects, incubate new ideas, or accept incubated projects from the
> incubator?
>
> 7/
> a) Are there any compeling arguments which can be raised to support
> remaining within Jakarta?
>
> Score 1 for each of the following answers:
> 1a yes
> 1b no
> 2a not much
> 3a real mix
> 3b generally amicable
> 4a yes
> 5a normal supply/consume relationship
> 5b not much direct contribution to or by other sub-projects
> 6a yes
> 6b yes
> 7a not really
>
> Total 1-3 You probably belong here, consider staying.
> Total 4-6 You might need to address some issues before you go.
> Total 7-9 Promotion could be your path to further growth and maturity.
> Total 10-11 You treat this place like a hotel, its time to think about
what
> you really want.
>
>
> d.
>
>
>
>
***************************************************************************
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the
addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for
delivery of the message to the intended recipient) please notify us
immediately on 0141 306 2050 and delete the message from your computer. You
may not copy or forward it or use or disclose its contents to any other
person. As Internet communications are capable of data corruption Student
Loans Company Limited does not accept any  responsibility for changes made
to this message after it was sent. For this reason it may be inappropriate
to rely on advice or opinions contained in an e-mail without obtaining
written confirmation of it. Neither Student Loans Company Limited or the
sender accepts any liability or responsibility for viruses as it is your
responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in
this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and
views of The Student Loans Company Limited.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the
presence of computer viruses.
>
> **************************************************************************
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to