Approach.  

Use struts if you're using JSP
Use Tapestry if you want to attach logic with div tags
As for turbine....Cheshire cat grin...a lot of people use it with velocity.
Use Cocoon is you live breathe and die XML and don't mind the extreme joy
that comes from writing web pages in XSLT with its user friendly regular
expression-like syntax


Yes struts can use things that aren't JSP but is not OPTIMAL for that.
Tapestry is well pretty different (I make no bones that I like it best for
webapps)
Turbine ...Cheshire cat grin
Cocoon can theoretically be a toaster if you configure it right, but has the
largest learning curve of the 4.

I understand why you came here to ask this, but its not really a good place
to ask (its more of an administrative list).  You'd be better going and
asking each of the projects (who will probably send you links to their
website).  Generally these messages devolve into flamebait because each
project feels very passionate about their approach (enough to devote real
time to developing it in fact) so asking them all in a room together "what's
the difference" is well...often not pretty.

-- 
Andrew C. Oliver
http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp
Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI

http://jakarta.apache.org/poi
For Java and Excel, Got POI?

The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost
definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its
general membership.  In fact they probably most definitively disagree with
everything espoused in the above email.

> From: "Thiago Souza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:53:52 -0300
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Differences
> 
> Hi ppl,
> 
> 
>       What's the main difference between Struts, Tapestry and Turbine?
> 
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> Thiago Souza
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to