Hi, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] might be better and > > I could suggest, I think. > > I'm not sure I see why site-cvs@ would be better. Can you elaborate? I'm > also not sure who is on that list, since it doesn't seem to come with > site2 karma. I think we'd want the changes to go to a wider group in any > case. Yes, very simple reason. Compare to ws.apache.org (I mean, webservices @ apache). In ws.apache.org, every cvs commit logs go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see the logs @ eyebrowse / nagoya.apache) On the other hand, in jakarta.apache.org, they had not been. They have gone to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I am not sure why, but I believe it that there WERE very reason for it) Then, I could not understand (then) why "wiki commit logs" -- similar to cvs commit -- could come to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What i meant is - site-cvs would be rather "for the guys who have much concerns in the changes of the websites of jakarta.apache and related" -- and "who can supervise". -- By the way, it would be needed to join to [EMAIL PROTECTED] list to obtain site2 karma -- Only you should subscribe for posting a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], if i remember correctly. (I mean, no need to obtain site2 karma) There are about 100 people watching. Sincerely, --------------------------------------------------------------------- Tetsuya Kitahata -- Terra-International (Independent) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.terra-intl.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
