Late, but not too late... :-)

+1      Let's do it.

On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 17:58, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Suggested new bylaws are at:
> The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new set
> of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments,
> sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion
> (ie: active/inactive projects).
> Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4
> majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday.
> =======================
> [ ] +1 - let's do it
> [ ] -1 - not good
> =======================
> I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others we
> could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major
> disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be
> nice if they could change the subject (ie:  Madness   Was: [VOTE] Updating
> PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier.
> Hen
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]        +49 9131 50 654 0
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire
   Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development

"Fighting for one's political stand is an honorable action, but re-
 fusing to acknowledge that there might be weaknesses in one's
 position - in order to identify them so that they can be remedied -
 is a large enough problem with the Open Source movement that it
 deserves to be on this list of the top five problems."
                       --Michelle Levesque, "Fundamental Issues with
                                    Open Source Software Development"

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to