On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Daniel Rall wrote:
On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 21:40 +0000, robert burrell donkin wrote:On 16 Nov 2004, at 17:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<snip>
@@ -27,3 +49,11 @@ === Subproject news ===
(** implies report based on the mailing lists by the chair) + +(These projects need to provide a status) + + * Commons Betwixt + * Commons HttpClient + * Tapestry + * Tomcat + * Turbine
what sort of thing's needed...?
I was wondering the same. Is there a PMC status reporting template somewhere?
Sorry for slowness in replying; s'been top of the todo list.
I've not had feedback that previous reports from subprojects were bad, just that our last report was lacking reports for subprojects who had obviously done things (by releasing code) and the suggestion that a release should imply a subproject report on the Jakarta report; which makes sense to me.
Previous reports seem to give a good set of topics. New committers should already be listed above, but information on future plans, reasons for the new releases, death of project (Watchdog), new pieces of work are all of interest. Examples would be:
HttpClient have released a bugfix (2.0.2) and are in the last steps of releasing an alpha of (3.0). Upon the release of 3.0, we plan to leave the Commons and become a Jakarta subproject, extending the scope of HttpClient to dadadada....
Notes about responses to Tomcat security issues are probably of a lot of interest. Releases that fix those etc. Slide's thoughts on becoming a TLP, though that'll be in my status notes as it was on the pmc/general list.
Hen
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
