Just happened to notice that some of the HTML files in the docs tree don't have corresponding XML files in the xdocs tree.
For example docs/site/cvsonunix.html docs/site/elsewhere.html both of these correspond to deleted xml files in xdocs/site Seems to me that there's no point keeping the html files if the source xml files have been deleted (or moved elsewhere). There are also differences for some of the image types (gif jpeg jpg svg xcf png) that are copied from xdocs - though in this case the images have been deleted from docs/images, but not from xdocs/images. There are some files that are only in the docs tree - for example .htaccess, .cgi and some .txt files. These look OK. But it looks like docs/tac.jar and docs/buildsite.sh could be deleted. Any objections if I start clearing this up? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
