On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:27:51 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1) Demo Builds, Milestone Builds: Do we even use these terms regularly? We have 1 demo build, and I thought we did RC's rather than Milestones. I'm not sure we even need to push the nightlies at this level; the project pages themselves should be fine as anyone looking for a nightly is probably deeply involved with that project as a user.
I'd be fine with getting rid of separate sections for these, and simply putting RCs in the main section, but that presupposes that we want to mirror RCs...
Should RC's even be on this page? The reality is that currently we list about 3% of all the RC's made.
I'm going to kill the Demo Build section as the only link (Velocity demo) fails.
3) Why advertise related projects? They're in the navbar about an inch away.
I think the original purpose of this section was to provide links to projects that had moved out of Jakarta to TLPs. It would help people who were not yet aware that a project had "gone TLP". Now, however, that section seems to have a lot more in it, making it somewhat less meaningful. It might make sense to reinstate the original purpose, listing only "graduated" projects and renaming the section to reflect that.
Switching to Graduated.
I've removed DB, Geronimo, Gump, HTTP Server, Incubator, Web Services and XML as ones I don't think came from Jakarta. Hard to say with Gump, DB, Web Services. I'm not sure if bits didn't exist in Jakarta.
(at least, I'm doing this. Should be live relatively soon)
Hen
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
