> On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 16:52 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/> > > I just regenerated the site, but I avoided reverting those two. I could > > easily have committed those; I just didn't know what the "etiquette" > > is. > > for me, it's a judgement call depending on the person and the change. > hopefully, other people will jump in here with more general opinions...
OK, so if we don't have a clear standing etiquette, here is my opinion: If someone updated xdocs/; he/she most probably also intended to update docs/ *and* intended to do the svn update. I see this as atomic. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
