On 3/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (feel free to keep discussing names etc, but for the moment I'm going to > go ahead with the one above) > <snip/>
But do it within a reasonable time frame (atleast post any objections to JWC in a week -- I think thats reasonable, unless anyone wants more time?). I have been meaning to add some initial components to JWC and begin work there, and while I agree that the name is important, this name game is now getting old ;-) Recap - We had 3 votes for JWC in the initial vote thread, and there seems to have been more added informally on parallel conversations on commons-dev. Seems the J*C "trend" is catching on (see Stephen talk about JLC in another thread). > Would anyone like to start putting together a list of constituent parts > for JWC? Please include a proposal for what will happen to any subprojects > left dead by the creation of JWC (ie: Taglibs). > <snap/> Allow me to informally assemble the beginnings of a roster, hopefully others can add/remove. >From Commons: * EL (dormant?) * FileUpload (active, martinc should confirm interest in moving to JWC) * Latka (dormant) * FeedParser (possibly? dormant) >From Taglibs: * Reusable Dialog Components (RDC) (JSP 2.0, active) * Others per interest (I have little interest in JSP 1.1/1.2 taglibs, been on 2.0 for a while now) Then there is the question of sandbox. There has been talk about a Jakarta sandbox, that probably deserves its own thread. -Rahul > Hen > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
