On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Checking mailing lists tonight indicates that POI has quite a healthy set of messages as is. I didn't see much development discussion (an indicator of community) but I could be mistaken.
There's not a lot of conversation on poi-dev; though there is a healthy flow via bugzilla comments and occasional svn commits.
IMO, a *forced* merger of POI with another group would have very negative consequences, both for POI and the other group. Sorry I wasn't clear on that.
Agreed.
At the moment, I see this debate as not affecting POI. (It also probably excludes Hivemind and possibly some other subprojects). IMHO, this debate is about commons and the inactive/mature Jakarta subprojects.
Yup. Tapestry -> TLP Slide -> TLP (if they get active enough to do it) Cactus/JMeter -> TLP (need to write a proposal) Turbine -> Against TLP HiveMind -> Just brought an email on TLP alive again. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
