On 5/9/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 Henri Yandell wrote on Tuesday, May 08, 2007 7:20 PM: > Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect. > > However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that > it move to TLP. > > http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution > > Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added > your name yet. > > [ ] +1 I support the proposal > [ ] +0 I don't care > [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... > > Voting will close in one week. > > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi,
I am not a Jakarta commiter, and also vote is not binding, but I want to ask something. What are the benefits for commons of moving to a TLP? Also as I read the official commons intro, it states that commons is a project "focused on all aspects of reusable Java components". So as we all know Jakarta is a devision of Apache, that deals with the Java open-source projects in the foundation, therefore, as I see it, it would be better for commons to stay in the Jakarta. So, maybe I am wrong, but I don't see any direct benefit for commons to move to a TLP. That's why, I have to vote: -1 and ask you to prove me wrong. Thank you all. -- Regards, Petar! Karlovo, Bulgaria. Public PGP Key at: http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9
