On 05/06/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could you create an example on how you would consider the structure and content as "acceptable" so that we can understand what you want to have?Thanks Henning
I thought I already had done so: On 27/05/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 27/05/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The license under which the code gets licensed to our end users is in > LICENSE.txt. > > Copyright notices and optional third-party licenses under which the code > got licensed to us is in NOTICE. Are you sure? That does not seem to agree with the sample NOTICE file: http://www.apache.org/licenses/example-NOTICE.txt Nor does it seem to agree with the way that httpd use the NOTICE and LICENSE files: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/ As I understand it, the NOTICE file is for attributions. The LICENSE file is for licenses. These may either be included inline, or in separate files referenced from the main LICENSE file.
S/// --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
