On Nov 18, 2007 12:07 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 16, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Earlier today I did some graphs on cross-pollination among Apache > > projects and blogged a summary at [1]. Jakarta always ended up > > dominating the graphs, so the version on my blog has Jakarta excluded. > > Why? W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't make any sense. For example, > the Jakarta-free one has velocity's only relationship to DB (!), and > for Harmony, to DB and XML! Ant, arguably one of the most pervasive > projects, has no connection to anything else...
Ant as a piece of software is pervasive - but are the Ant committers pervasive? Jukka's cloud shows community/commiter relationships rather than software. The Jakarta one is interesting as it shows so much of JavaLand at the ASF sprang from Jakarta. I agree with Jukka though - it distorts the landscape. Niall > geir > > > > > If you're interested, there's a version with Jakarta in it at [2]. :-) > > > > [1] http://jukkaz.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/the-apache-cloud/ > > [2] http://people.apache.org/~jukka/2007/asf5.png > > > > > BR, > > > > Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
