> 4 days, 1 answer :-(
Try to be more clear about what you are proposing.
> Noel: can you please change the svn notification so that it works on the
> full james repository? If you have specific options it would be good if
> server commits had the server-dev reply-to and the other had the general
> reply-to.
That does not seem appropriate.
It appears that you are proposing a Maven repository. Aside from my
continued opposition to supporting Maven repositories until Maven
authenticates their downloads, such repositories are supposed to be
coordinated ASF-wide via the repository@ mailing list. I'm not at all sure
that what you propose is according to ASF policy.
> we should introduce a james project third party library repository
> where we'll include every "non-apache" library used by our releases.
We should NOT do so except in conjunction with such an effort on an ASF-wide
basis. We already have enough problems with abuse of the ASF
infrastructure. Once again, the appropriate place to discuss repositories
is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> As a sidenote I would prefer a structure where we have
> trunk/branches/tags at the top
Subversion 101: A {ttb} structure is associated with each independently
releasable artifact.
--- Noel
