On 11/16/06, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But why are we having a public PMC vote on general@ regarding a James Server issue?
Because we are the Project Management Commitee, and it is our responsibility to resolve issues like these. There is confusion regarding what version number will be "next" for James, the PMC should resolve that confusion.
This my vote is only binding for James Server releases. jSPF for example may establish another versioning scheme.
If this is agreed and understood by a majority of people working on jSPF then the PMC is likely not to have any interest. d.
