Stefano Bagnara wrote:

Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> I'd like to propose that we add a new mailinglist, an announce type
>>> one called [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> We ALL agree that we want more responsive handling of news.  Let's
>> focus on the consensus, and come to an agreeable solution.
> We already focused on the consensus: and we had pretty much consensus
> before you arrived ;-)

No comment other than what I read I found somewhat disturbing.   Danny had a
good idea, and I agree with it.  Moving from that to an off-site blog is
*the* part that I am strongly against.

> We moved from the mailing list to the blog because mailing list are
> "write-once" and we are not allowed to review the content (moderation
> is done by a single moderator anyway).

Simple solution: post the announcement as a draft to the dev@ list for
review.

I agree that we want a simple way to post news.  For years, we have
neglected the site, and just posted announcements to the mailing list.  Once
or twice every other year, someone would update the news area of the site.
Again, I agree with Danny's goal entirely.  And if you notice, in another
e-mail I've asked you a specific question about process, and agreed that it
could be at least an interim approach.

> Danny showed us a javascript

Yes:

  <script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/apache-james?format=sigpro";
          type="text/javascript" />

Separate issue, but I like Javascript *almost* as much as I like Maven.  I
have to deal with it daily, but I am in the anti-camp due to security
issues.  Sure, *I* can selectively enable/disable Javascript, but I don't
want to subject the general community to security vulnerabilities (enabling
Javascript) just for the sake of a news feed on our home page.

I do like what Danny accomplished.  As I said in another e-mail, I want to
see the news integrated into our site, and Paul Querna had also suggested
feedburner.  But he suggested that it be used to generate static HTML, not
used as above.  There has to be a better way than Javascript.  Let's find
it.

I'll be looking for details on your proposed workflow.  Again, not against a
nice workflow for publishing news.  Against an external URL, and against
Javascript for security reasons.

        --- Noel


Reply via email to