DigiGod Q Frasch� wrote:

> how about: org.jos.tools.actionmanager. I say this because we seem to have beans 
>that arent applications and are to big to be called utilities (and would only be used 
>by apps anyway), so we should put
> them in tools. Or you could put it in: org.jos.apps.util.actionmanager (or 
>apps.tools). But ui.event.actionmanager makes me think of event and listner classes, 
>not a toolbar builder.

Yeah, but if it's part of the system really, then is should be in the
system packages. I would assume that ActionManager would be used by
system classes, too, right?

-- 

      "Learn from others' mistakes, for you won't live long
          enough to make them all yourself..."
___________________________________________________________________
[EMAIL: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [DSS: 0xDBEF8ECC | RSA: 0xBC469499]
[URL: http://www.outworld.org/people/al/] [TEL: (0030) +31 422 392]
DO NOT SEND ME UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL, RELIGIOUS OR POLITICAL EMAIL

_______________________________________________
General maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to