> I'm not sure. "Tools" makes me think of user tools, not tools used to build
> programs. But maybe that's just me? :) (I'd be happy with it)
hmm, I always think of the disparate collection of various classes, beans, and
applications I keep in my "programers toolbox"
> I'd prefer util.apps in that case (because it's a utility used to build apps).
> org.jos.apps should only house actual application IMO, which the
> ActionManager isn't.
good point.
> I'd be happy with an alternative name. I was never satisfied with
> "ActionManager", but I couldn't come up with a better name. ActionUtility,
> which is pretty good IMO, is already taken :)
>
> As for GUIGenerator or GUITools... Hmm. I'd prefer the former over the
> latter, although I don't think neither of them are right on target. But
> they're probably better than ActionManager...
ActionGenerator?
> Any other suggestions?
Have it so you can generate from XML (I have a DTD for a "ToolbarML" I never used
somewhere, if you are interested)
Cheers,
DigiGod
_________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM:DigiGod 86
_________________________
Quote of the Moment:
Thus spake the master Ninjei:
"To the intelligent man, one word, to the fleet horse
one whip, to the well-written program, a single
command"
_________________________
Prank of the Moment:
Using the conferencing feature of your office phone, dial
one Induhvidual, then while it's ringing dial another and
conference them together. Put your own phone on mute
and listen to see how long they'll make small talk before
figuring out that neither one placed the call.
O-
_______________________________________________
General maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/general
