Henry Rich wrote:
> Or
>
>    1+1x1^0j1p1
> 0
>
What's wrong with

   1+^0j1p1
0

or to bring out the fact that the exponent is imaginary

  1+^j.1p1
0
  1+^j.o.1
0

Best wishes,

John

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to