Don, you need to re-read my post ... it was the business
systems analysis course that used nine year old material.

I correct myself however since many of the techniques
of 1975 were still valid in 1984, and even today.

Rather than use the word "obsolete", I should have
written that Shelley and Cashman of 1975 was devoid
of substantial advances regarding hardware evolution
and software methodologies that were mainstream and/or
leading edge in 1984.  The business systems analyst,
while not necessarily a programmer herself/himself,
needs to have a sufficient understanding of technology
in order to design and develop a solution that can
appropriately take advantage of the available technology.

I currently am developing some software in assembler.
imo, assembler is never obsolete ... it is often
the best tool for many applications ... every programmer
can benefit from an understanding of assembler, even
when writing in languages that offer higher abstraction.

It seems that assembler courses are in fact machine language
course with mnemonics making it easier to get the machine
language syntactically correct.  imo a good assembler course
goes beyond the machine language by teaching appropriate
programming techniques.

regards, gerry

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
  • Re: [Jgeneral] M... GerryLowry1(905)825-9582{AbilityBusinessComputerServices}
    • Re: [Jgener... Don Guinn
      • Re: [Jg... GerryLowry1(905)825-9582{AbilityBusinessComputerServices}

Reply via email to