Never mind
just lame response to lame response
Donna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 26-Jun-06, at 2:38 PM, Randy MacDonald wrote:
Hello Donna;
%/ 111 333
0.333333
...I don't think I see your point. The 111 is lost here as well.
I'm sure there is a function (r: perhaps?) such that:
111 r: 333
is the same(which, of course, is a meta-J notion) as
111r333
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
|\/| Randy A MacDonald | APL: If you can say it, it's done.. (ram)
|/\| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|\ | |If you cannot describe what you are doing
BSc(Math) UNBF'83 þas a process, you don't know what you're
doing.
Sapere Aude | - W. E. Deming
Natural Born APL'er | Demo website: http://156.34.90.191/
-----------------------------------------------------(INTP)----
{ gnat }-
----- Original Message ----- From: "dly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General forum" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] significant digits
Donna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 26-Jun-06, at 1:58 PM, Randy MacDonald wrote:
I would prefer the shorter answer. The two item list:
111 333
does preserve the original terms, but hides the division
operation. Trade-off city...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/
forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
