Yes #2 implies #1. #1 is correct but spurious. Just some critique
of the documentation. It can only go anywhere if there is someone
maintaining the documentation and they think there is room for
improvement and they think this is a move in the direction of
improvement.
Thanks
Donna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 30-Jun-06, at 2:30 PM, Randy MacDonald wrote:
Hello Donna;
Looks to me like #2 (except the part about the characterization of
Intersection/P) implies #1.
I'm not sure where you are going with this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
