Hi Donna;

There seems to be room for Icelandic speakers.

I find that the vagaries of English et al, can be remedied by phrasing things directly in J, much like having a piano present can facilitate a discussion of a musical subject.

One question: how did you get that single symbol for <- , or those Greek characters from an earlier post?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
|\/| Randy A MacDonald   | APL: If you can say it, it's done.. (ram)
|/\| [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
|\ |                     |If you cannot describe what you are doing
BSc(Math) UNBF'83        þas a process, you don't know what you're doing.
Sapere Aude              |     - W. E. Deming
Natural Born APL'er      | Demo website: http://156.34.82.232/
-----------------------------------------------------(INTP)----{ gnat }-

----- Original Message ----- From: "dly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General forum" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] significant digits


I am trying to learn J terms

If J terms can actually be used to describe J technically why not use
them?

There are not enough forums to have special conversations for native
speakers of APL, C++, Java, Excell Spreadsheet users, Dutch, French,
Cantonese, Polish, the 820 listed living languages of Papua New
Guinea, German...

function, operator, relation...

Users/sid/j504/system/extras/help/primer/terminology.htm
. . . One problem it deals with is the plethora of related, but
subtly different, uses of traditional terms in math and numerous
programming languages. For example: function, subfunction, operator,
program, routine, and subroutine are all used in slightly different
ways in different programming languages. Rather than inherit this
confusion, J adopts its own terms, and defines them precisely within
its context.

Donna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




On 1-Jul-06, at 3:22 AM, Randy MacDonald wrote:

Hello Donna;

Why not use the J term VERB?

I suspect it is a first-language-APL thing. function/verb are interchangeable to me. To insist on one term over another is a bit "Academie Française" to me.

many
Why not...

I'm seeing this is as you saying "this also works" my first impression was in error. Never mind. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --
|\/| Randy A MacDonald   | APL: If you can say it, it's done.. (ram)
|/\| [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
|\ |                     |If you cannot describe what you are doing
BSc(Math) UNBF'83        þas a process, you don't know what you're  doing.
Sapere Aude              |     - W. E. Deming
Natural Born APL'er      | Demo website: http://156.34.82.232/
-----------------------------------------------------(INTP)---- { gnat }-


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to